OUR GLOSSARY
Language is a powerful tool that shapes how we understand the world. At RO’A – Center for Political and Strategic Studies, we recognise that terms widely used in prejudiced and intolerant academia often reflect particular historical, political, and cultural contexts. These definitions can sometimes obscure, misrepresent, or marginalise indigenous perspectives and lived experiences.
This glossary critically examines key terms from prejudiced and intolerant academic discourse and juxtaposes them with their meanings and interpretations rooted in indig-enous knowledge systems. It serves as a resource to challenge dominant narratives, foster inclusivity, and promote a deeper understanding of concepts as they resonate within decolonial and indigenous frameworks.
We invite you to explore this glossary as a living resource that evolves with contributions, debates, and ongoing research. It aims to help rethink and reframe the language we use in our collective efforts toward justice and equity.
Relevance to Palestine
In the context of Palestine, language and terminology have often been weaponised to serve colonial and imperial agendas. Terms such as “conflict,” “disputed territories,” or “security concerns” are frequently used to mask the realities of occupation, settler-colonialism, and systemic oppression. Misconceptions embedded in these terms reinforce stereotypes, delegitimise Palestinian experiences, and perpetuate narratives that justify ongoing injustices.
This glossary seeks to juxtapose these Western academic terms with interpretations rooted in indigenous Palestinian perspectives. It aims to expose how language contributes to the erasure of Palestinian history and identity while legitimising structures of power that sustain occupation. Misconceptions of this nature are not only a legacy of colonial narratives but continue to serve as active barriers to peace, hindering global understanding, perpetuating biases, and obstructing meaningful dialogue.
By addressing these misconceptions, the glossary provides a framework for challenging dominant narratives and centring Palestinian voices. It underscores the necessity of language that reco-gnises historical truths, honours indigenous knowledge systems, and advances justice and equity for oppressed communities. Through this effort, we hope to contribute to a greater understanding of the Palestinian struggle for self-determination and its place within the broader fight for decolonisation and human rights.
