All Surveys Bar Chart

Palestinian Perspectives on the Impediments Facing Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Resolution: Mapping of Palestinian Opinion Leaders

October 2023 Palestinians

Survey Overview

Identify impediments and opportunities for ending the occupation through conflict resolution. Capture diverse viewpoints and agendas related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict/occupation. Analyze current realities, contributing factors, and ideological solutions.

Methodology

Consultative Preparatory Workshop

100 In-Depth Interviews

mceclip1.png

 

 

Key Findings

Key Findings: Geopolitical Factors

Overwhelming Pessimism: Pessimism regarding global conditions, including US/Israel hegemony, the Russia-Ukraine war, and the changing roles of China and Russia. New digital/virtual realities influencing young people.

Regional Factors:

  • Instability, insecurity, and economic issues in Arab countries, diverting attention from the Palestinian cause.
  • Normalization with Israel and shifts in relations with Turkey and Iran.

Israeli Factors:

  • Israel's strengths in technology, agriculture, and security industries, and foster global interests.
  • Rise of the religious-secular right-wing coalition and settler population's political influence.
  • Power Dynamics:

    • Israel's dominating influence in the conflict.
    • References to occupation, control, and violations.
    • Limited mention of Israeli peace groups.

    Economic Factors:

    • Israel's private sector control over Palestine's resources.
    • Normalization attempts for economic benefits.
    • Israeli side

      # of mentions

      Palestinian side

      # of mentions

      Occupation (colonial/colonialism)

      2295

      Resistance

      697

      Force/power/militarism

      707

      Struggle

      540

      Use of non-militaristic control tools (technology, civil society, etc.)

      119

      Armed resistance

      143

      Judaization/Jewish/Jews

      636

      Steadfastness

      92

      Fascism/apartheid/extreme/racist/discriminatory

      91

      Sacrifice/unjust/suffering/ violated/killing/imprisonment/ injury/ demolition/ strike/land expropriation/ movement restriction 

      435

 

The Palestinian Authority (PA):

  • Universally disappointing and criticized by participants.
  • Viewed as a tool for Israel to shift service responsibilities to Palestinians while solidifying control.

The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO):

  • Diminished role and influence acknowledged by all.
  • Emphasis on the need for extensive reform to restore leadership status.

Hamas:

  • Diverse views on Hamas.
  • Some see it as a leader of resistance against the Occupation and a force for change.
  • Others view it as entrenching division, serving regional powers, or relying on PA for Gaza services while investing in military or religious influence.

 

Actor

# of mentions

PLO/historic leadership

1316

PA

923

Hamas

750

Fateh

428

Youth/movement

204

Palestinian left

170

Youth militant groups (Jenin/Nablus)

160

Religious groups (Palestinian)

136

Islamic Jihad

130

Civil society/NGOs

102

Other leftist groups (DFLP)

65

Regional Actors:

Prominent mentions of Iran, Egypt, and Gulf monarchies.

Iran:

Noted for ties to Palestinian resistance groups and confrontational stance toward Israel.

Egypt:

Relevant due to the strong influence in Gaza, mediating truces between Palestinian factions and Israel.

Gulf countries:

Financial and internal political role vs. normalization with Israel.

Prominent Global Actor:

  • The US was frequently mentioned.
  • Highlighted for providing extensive military, financial, and diplomatic support to Israel in maintaining the Occupation.
  • Credibility questioned in the US’s role as a mediator.

Perceptions of the UN:

  • Mixed views on the UN and its agencies.
  • Positive appraisal for recognizing Palestine in UN bodies and the role of the ICJ.
  • Criticism regarding the UN's perceived harm against Palestine due to the influence of the US and Israel.

Hegemonic Control System (Centaur): Israel's strategy is summarized as 'Maximum Colonization with Maximum Normalization.'

 

Actors & Influencing Parties (International)

Indicative wording

# of mentions

USA

612

EU/West/countries

354

UN/international institutions

170

Russia/Ukraine

204

China

124

 

Israel’s Approach

Maximum Colonization with Maximum Normalization

Hegemonic Control System (Centaur): Israel's strategy is summarized as 'Maximum Colonization with Maximum Normalization.'

Challenges Faced by Palestinians

Palestinian Authority (PA):

  • PA is reduced to an entity providing time and space for occupation.
  • Identity is shaped by financial and political impotence.
  • Conflict transformed into a struggle for basic needs.

Internal Division and Weakness:

  • Decades-long split between Fateh and Hamas.
  • Geographic fragmentation and limited political vision, economic challenges, and corruption weaken the struggle.

Regional and International Factors:

  • Normalization between Arab and Muslim countries.
  • Diminishing donor aid due to other regional crises.
  • Lack of allies or support.

International Pressures:

  • Rise of right-wing parties in the US and Europe.
  • Impact of the Ukraine War and COVID pandemic on assistance.
  • Social and Political Developments:
  • Erosion of national consciousness due to globalization and social media.

 

 

Majority Shift:

Most leaders no longer consider the two-state solution plausible, though some hold onto the possibility of its revival.

Alternative Solutions

One-State Solution:

  • Leaders are generally unenthusiastic due to Zionist supremacist character.
  • Belief that extant factors may lead to a one-state outcome regardless of preferences.

Concern for Cantonized System:

  • The greatest concern among leaders is the consecration of the current cantonized system with supreme Israeli control and limited Palestinian autonomy.

 

Final Status Issues

Pressing Threat:

Land grabbing by settlements was highlighted as the most pressing threat, undermining the two-state solution.

Jerusalem:

Jerusalem is mentioned as the second most critical final status issue.

Refugees:

Refugees discussed, with strong support for full implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 194.

 

Summary of Opportunities and Future Prospects

Bleak analysis of the conditions around final-status issues; yet optimism continues among a minority

A large majority of leaders surveyed have a bleak view of the future, with 75 percent believing that Palestinian society is headed in the wrong direction

 

A Nationalist Agenda Continues to be at the Core of the Discourse;
Even with the Rise of Islamist Agendas

Indicative wording

# of mentions

Palestine/Palestinian

7362

Nationalism/nationalist (Palestinian)/national identity

1241

Historic Palestine/1948/occupied Palestine (now Israel)

391

Islam/Islamic/Islamist

238

Arabism/Pan Arabism

17

Liberalism/new liberalism

41

Secularism

41

Sovereignty over Land as Core to all Other Issues

Type of state

# of mentions

Two-state solution/independent state 1967

228

Historic Palestine as the ultimate solution

146

Self-Governance regime

31

One-state solution

27

Confederation (Egypt/Jordan)

10

Bi-national state

7

Confederation with Israel

6

mceclip3.png